Sustainability KPIs for integrated reporting

Tomoki Oshika (Faculty of Commerce, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan)
Chika Saka (School of Business Administration, Kwansei Gakuin University, Nishinomiya, Japan)

Social Responsibility Journal

ISSN: 1747-1117

Publication date: 7 August 2017

Abstract

Purpose

The framework of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) is principles-based and does not provide specific key performance indicators (KPIs) for integrated thinking and reporting. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to propose KPIs for integrated reporting which decipher a firm’s sustainability through empirical analysis.

Design/methodology/approach

As a proxy of firms’ sustainability, the authors focus on firms that have survived for more than 100 years and that have already achieved sustainability, and analyze these firms to reveal the financial features that distinguish sustainable firms from the other firms.

Findings

The study found two distinguishing facts: the value added that is distributed to stakeholders other than shareholders is significantly larger, and the stability of profitability and the profitability itself are significantly higher in sustainable firms.

Practical implications

The study proposes a value-added distribution and the stability of profitability as sustainability KPIs for integrated reporting.

Originality/value

First, this study provides the first evidence that value added distribution and the stability of profitability distinguish a firm’s sustainability. Second, it provides a new perspective in the search for sustainability KPIs. Third, as the empirical data consist of all listed firms in 136 countries, the results should be robust and general.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology-Japan, and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for their financial support (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C): 15K03792).

Citation

Oshika, T. and Saka, C. (2017), "Sustainability KPIs for integrated reporting", Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 625-642. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2016-0122

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.