To read this content please select one of the options below:

Corporate sustainability reporting practices in India: myth or reality?

Najul Laskar (Department of Commerce, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India)
Santi Gopal Maji (Department of Commerce, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India)

Social Responsibility Journal

ISSN: 1747-1117

Article publication date: 3 October 2016

1945

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to look into the sustainability practices of Indian firms in terms of the quality of disclosure, the impact of corporate sustainability performance (CSP) on firm performance and the appropriateness of the sustainability reporting guidelines followed by the firms.

Design/methodology/approach

The present study is based on secondary data collected from annual reports and corporate sustainability reports of 28 listed Indian non-financial firms from 2008-2009 to 2013-2014. Content analysis is used to calculate the score in terms of level (binary coding system) and quality of disclosure (four-point scale). These scores are further used to examine the impact of CSP on firm performance by using an appropriate regression model.

Findings

The study finds that the average level of disclosure is 88 per cent, whereas the quality of disclosure is nearly 80 per cent. The influence of CSP (in terms of level and quality disclosure) on firm performance is positive and significant. Moreover, the study also reveals that the Global Reporting Initiatives framework is not sufficient enough to publish the sustainability report of any business concern. The outcomes of the study, thus, indicate that sustainability practices of Indian firms are not myth but approaching toward reality.

Originality/value

It is the first comprehensive study in India to analyze the corporate sustainability reporting practices encompassing different dimensions of sustainability.

Keywords

Citation

Laskar, N. and Maji, S.G. (2016), "Corporate sustainability reporting practices in India: myth or reality?", Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 625-641. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2015-0065

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles