Copyright and creation: repositioning the argument
Abstract
Purpose
This paper highlights the challenges and key arguments for digital copyright protection legislation for creative industries.
Design/methodology/approach
This briefing is prepared by independent academics who place the arguments in context based upon literature and market data.
Findings
Many of the arguments used against copyright protection laws draw upon flawed analysis. Artistic creators should be treated fairly and their work should be afforded the same protection as other property.
Practical implications
Digital legislation warrants review, but not for the frequently cited reasons of “stifling innovation” or “restriction” of others using the work. Rather, artists need better protection for their work and fairer treatment with regards their property rights.
Originality/value
The paper provides context and practical insights into the data used to influence policy decision makers, providing a stronger case for legislative review.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
The researchers would like to acknowledge the support of the Faculty of Business and Law at the University of the West of England and the Business School of the University of Birmingham for providing support for the work. Oscar F. Bustinza acknowledges financial support from ECO2010-16814. Ferran Vendrell-Herrero acknowledges financial support from ECO2010-21393-C04.
Citation
Parry, G., F. Bustinza, O. and Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2014), "Copyright and creation: repositioning the argument", Strategic Direction, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 32-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-11-2013-0092
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited