The ongoing monitoring of societal responsibility in management research activities: A secondary analysis and a heuristic instrumentation

Abstract

Purpose

This article aims to highlight the need to explore the concept of social responsibility at the very heart of research activity. Questioning the social responsibility of research activities in management provides the opportunity to take a fresh look at the criteria used to assess its usefulness.

Design/methodology/approach

Drawing on a secondary analysis of a longitudinal research process, this paper emphasizes the importance of achieving an ongoing co-monitoring of the issues about social responsibility involved in research.

Findings

This reflection leads to a first characterization of two key dimensions of the societal responsibility of researchers in management: their professional responsibility and their institutional responsibility.

Research limitations/implications

It is meant to encourage researchers to design a relevant instrumentation to help them negotiate, make explicit and co-monitor the issues of social responsibility involved in their empirical investigations as well as in their theoretical elaborations.

Social implications

As research projects are socially situated activities, always infused with values and ideologies, it is crucial that researchers reflect upon the axiology guiding their empirical and theoretical work.

Originality/value

In order to achieve an ongoing co-monitoring of the issues about social responsibility involved in management research, the article suggests a heuristic deviated use of the balanced scorecard.

Citation

Dreveton, B. and De La Ville, V.-I. (2014), "The ongoing monitoring of societal responsibility in management research activities: A secondary analysis and a heuristic instrumentation", Society and Business Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-06-2013-0045