To read this content please select one of the options below:

Foreign direct investment and the environment: disentangling the impact of greenfield investment and merger and acquisition sales

Ayesha Ashraf (Punjab Economic Research Institute, Planning and Development Board, Lahore, Pakistan)
Nadia Doytch (Koppelman School of Business, CUNY – Brooklyn College, New York, New York, USA; Program in Economics, CUNY – Graduate Center, New York, New York, USA and Ateneo de Manila University School of Government, Manila, The Philippines)
Merih Uctum (Koppelman School of Business, CUNY – Brooklyn College, New York, New York, USA and Program in Economics, CUNY – Graduate Center, New York, New York, USA)

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal

ISSN: 2040-8021

Article publication date: 2 July 2020

Issue publication date: 16 January 2021

696

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine the effect of greenfield foreign direct investment (GFDI) and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) on the environment and more specifically, on the sectoral emissions of CO2. The authors identify significant differential and income effects with various data classifications of foreign direct investment (FDI) mode of entry.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors use system generalized method of moments with instruments for income and GFDI and M&A, which allows us to control for present reverse causality and endogeneity of income and the two modes of FDI.

Findings

Evidence from the full sample reveals that GFDI increases pollution, supporting the pollution haven hypothesis, while M&As decrease pollution in line with the halo effect hypothesis. GFDI flowing into poorer countries worsens the environment, while M&As flowing to industrialized economies reduce pollution. Entry-mode effects are also present at the level of industry emissions. GFDI in developed economies decreases pollution in transport industry but increases it in poorer countries.

Practical implications

The authors demonstrate: first, a recipient country level-of-development effect: GFDI investment flowing into poorer countries has harmful effects on environment, but no significant effect in rich economies, while M&As flowing to industrialized economies have a beneficial effect to the environment, supporting the halo hypothesis. Second, the authors demonstrate a differential entry-mode effect at the industry level: GFDI in developed economies decreases pollution from transport industry, while both modes of entry in developing economies increase it.

Social implications

M&As emerge as a type of FDI that is less harmful to the environment. This is especially true in the case of developed economies. However, policymakers should oversee strictly the inbound GFDI flows and determine whether they carry “dirty” or “clean” production processes. This is the type of FDI to be regulated and scrutinized to ensure that economic development is fostered alongside environmental conservation.

Originality/value

In existing theoretical and empirical literature, little guidance is available on which mode of entry would have greater effect on the environment of the host country. This paper answers this issue by disaggregating FDI flows into GFDI and M&As and examining how each mode of entry impacts pollution in host countries. To the best of the knowledge, this is the first study that analyzes the environmental impact of the two modes of entry of FDI while disentangling the environmental Kuznets curve effect from the halo effect.

Keywords

Citation

Ashraf, A., Doytch, N. and Uctum, M. (2021), "Foreign direct investment and the environment: disentangling the impact of greenfield investment and merger and acquisition sales", Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0184

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles