To read this content please select one of the options below:

Comparing the informativeness of sustainability disclosures versus ESG disclosure ratings

Li Li Eng (Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri, USA)
Mahelet Fikru (Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri, USA)
Thanyaluk Vichitsarawong (Chulalongkorn Business School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand)

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal

ISSN: 2040-8021

Article publication date: 10 December 2021

Issue publication date: 17 February 2022

3084

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of sustainability disclosures and disclosure ratings on firm value. This paper compares the informativeness of sustainability disclosures in company reports versus environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure ratings. The authors examine the extent to which they provide incremental information.

Design/methodology/approach

The sample consists of panel data from over 2,600 publicly-listed non-financial US companies for the period 2014–2018. The authors obtain sustainability disclosures from Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Navigator and ESG disclosure scores from Bloomberg. The authors regress market value and/or stock price on sustainability disclosures and ESG scores to evaluate information content.

Findings

ESG scores are positively associated with market value and price. Sustainability disclosures in the form of metrics and company-tailored narratives provide incremental information content on market value and/or price. Boilerplate disclosures reduce market value and price. Sustainability disclosures and ESG scores provide incremental information, suggesting that it would be beneficial to harmonize standards for reporting sustainability disclosures.

Research limitations/implications

The limitation is that the authors have only considered sustainability disclosures for a sample of US companies from two sources – SASB Navigator and Bloomberg.

Practical implications

The paper provides some evidence that may be pertinent to the debate on whether to harmonize the guidance on reporting sustainability issues.

Social implications

The paper provides evidence on the benefits to firms for reporting sustainability issues.

Originality/value

This paper is among the first to analyze company sustainability disclosures obtained from two different sources – SASB Navigator and ESG disclosure ratings – and compare them for relevance for company valuation. With SASB Navigator, the authors obtain further refinement into the nature of the information provided in the sustainability disclosures, that is, boilerplate, company-tailored or metrics disclosures.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Data availability: Data are available from the sources identified in the paper. SASB Navigator for SASB disclosures; Bloomberg for ESG disclosure scores/ratings; and Compustat for accounting and financial data. Missouri S&T licensed the SASB Standards Navigator research platform.

Citation

Eng, L.L., Fikru, M. and Vichitsarawong, T. (2022), "Comparing the informativeness of sustainability disclosures versus ESG disclosure ratings", Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 494-518. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2021-0095

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles