TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose Amidst a growing interest in greenhouse gas (GHG) science-based target setting by businesses, it is becoming increasingly urgent to understand how these are set in theory and in practice.Design/methodology/approach Using a model framework for science-based methods, the authors compare four different science-based target-setting methods: sectoral decarbonization approach, linear emission reduction to target year, GHG emissions per unit of value added and corporate finance approach to climate stabilizing targets. Input and output variables, GHG scopes, allocation principles and mathematical formulations are described, followed by a discussion of the differences and similarities between methods.Findings The authors show GHG emission mitigation scenarios are as important in the determination of targets as the allocation principle.Practical implications For this reason, businesses should apply well-bellow 2ºC scenarios with robust sectoral and regional granularity and the science community should consider the needs of these groups of stakeholders.Social implications Policymakers should actively support efforts by corporations to set science-based targets and ensure that the research they commission can be translated into practical action by non-party stakeholders.Originality/value This paper contributes to the understanding of the theory and practice of science-based targets.
VL  - 11
IS  - 3
SN  - 2040-8021
DO  - 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2017-0031
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2017-0031
AU  - Faria Pedro Cabral Santiago
AU  - Labutong Nicole
PY  - 2019
Y1  - 2019/01/01
TI  - A description of four science-based corporate GHG target-setting methods
T2  - Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 591
EP  - 612
Y2  - 2024/04/20
ER  -