Research as a Social Practice: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat

Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences

ISBN: 978-1-78714-131-5, eISBN: 978-1-78714-130-8

ISSN: 2398-6018

Publication date: 15 February 2017

Abstract

This chapter responds to Matt Sleat’s chapter on appropriate ethical regulation for the social sciences (2017). I argue that research is a social practice which brings the researcher into relationships with a variety of institutional and individual actors including, but not limited to, research participants. In this context, I consider the range of ethical duties which may arise and the principles and values which may usefully underpin the conduct of social science research. In particular, I argue that the biomedical model should not be discarded but can be built upon to produce a more appropriate ethical framework for the social sciences.

Keywords

Citation

Rosemary Hunter (2017). 'Research as a Social Practice: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat', Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, Volume 1). Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 47-54

Download as .RIS

DOI

: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001005

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017 Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.