To read this content please select one of the options below:

The Teaching Excellence Framework: Quality, Equality and Student Engagement in English Higher Education

Contexts for Diversity and Gender Identities in Higher Education: International Perspectives on Equity and Inclusion

ISBN: 978-1-78756-057-4, eISBN: 978-1-78756-056-7

Publication date: 17 September 2018

Abstract

This chapter discusses the institutional contextual narratives provided as part of the evaluation of universities in the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) in England. The purpose of the TEF is to allow differentiation between higher education institutions on the basis of teaching quality, but the equality challenge unit has expressed reservations about the TEF’s ability to make sense of, or reflect, diverse student experiences of being taught. The authors follow the methodology of critical policy ethnography using higher education and government policy documents as a field of anthropological data and contend that, in order to understand large-scale transformations, such as the educational experience of students, the authors have to examine the ‘policy field’ and then locate more precise sites, in this case the TEF, for understanding the larger environment. The authors have systematically determined our search terms and used text-mining tools to search all the institutional narratives and obtain a broad ‘policy field’; we then select some key examples to analyse particular cases in more detail. This provides us with evidence from the statements to determine both how the perspective of students has been included in preparing the TEF contextual narratives and how diversity is being addressed.

Keywords

Citation

LeBihan, J., Hughes, C. and Taylor, C.A. (2018), "The Teaching Excellence Framework: Quality, Equality and Student Engagement in English Higher Education", Hoffman, J., Blessinger, P. and Makhanya, M. (Ed.) Contexts for Diversity and Gender Identities in Higher Education: International Perspectives on Equity and Inclusion (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 12), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120180000012011

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited