To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

External CSR Rating Influences on Shareholder Voting Patterns for CSR Shareholder-Sponsored Proposals

Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting

ISBN: 978-1-78754-973-9, eISBN: 978-1-78754-972-2

ISSN: 1574-0765

Publication date: 3 May 2018

Abstract

We examine the perceived influence of externally generated firm ratings of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on voting for shareholder-sponsored CSR proposals. Using stakeholder and legitimacy theories, we introduce two rationales that relate shareholder voting decisions to the firm’s CSR performance: the complementary perspective where investors rely on management’s branding or image of the firm for CSR performance, and the sufficiency perspective where shareholders consider legitimacy effects of firm CSR performance. Our examination of 473 CSR shareholder-sponsored proposals during the 2013 to 2015 proxy seasons reveals a negative relationship between support for shareholder-sponsored CSR proposals and CSR strengths, particularly for social and environmental CSR strengths. We also find a positive relationship between support for shareholder-sponsored CSR proposals and CSR concerns, particular in the area of environmental CSR concerns. These results partially support the sufficiency perspective that incorporates shareholder legitimacy concerns. When companies have poor CSR performance, shareholders may view further CSR initiatives as beneficial to the firm.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful comments received from participants at various American Accounting Association Meetings.

Citation

Cullinan, C.P., Mahoney, L.S. and Roush, P.B. (2018), "External CSR Rating Influences on Shareholder Voting Patterns for CSR Shareholder-Sponsored Proposals", Jefrey, C. (Ed.) Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting (Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, Vol. 21), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 83-110. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1574-076520180000021004

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited