TY - CHAP AB - Purpose – To recognize the comments made by Horwitz (2010) and Koppl (2010) in their attempts to reply to D'Amico and Boettke (forthcoming), “Making Sense out of The Sensory Order.” Furthermore, this paper hopes to explain what role D'Amico and Boettke do see for cognitive neuroscience in the study of Austrian economics.Methodology/approach – Some brief summary comments are presented about Horwitz (2010) and Koppl (2010). Then a general framework of individual learning and its effects upon social institutions and economic processes is described by referring to Cowan and Rizzo (1996) and Denzau and North (1994).Findings – Hayek was a political economist first and foremost. Whatever the status of his research in theoretical psychology attains, it does not change the fact that we as economists would do well (especially young economists) to focus on his substantive contributions to economics and political economy.Research limitations/implications – Though space and time constraints did not afford this at present, further research would benefit from an intensive survey of the empirical findings available in the neuroscience and neuroeconomics literatures. How do such findings map onto the proposed frameworks of Hayekian economics provided by Koppl compared to D'Amico and Boettke.Originality/value of paper – This paper takes notice of the historical linkage between Cowan and Rizzo's (1996) cognitive model of individual learning within the broader tradition of subjectivist/Hayekian/Austrian economics. VL - 13 SN - 978-1-84950-975-6, 978-1-84950-974-9/1529-2134 DO - 10.1108/S1529-2134(2010)0000013020 UR - https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-2134(2010)0000013020 AU - D'Amico Daniel J. AU - Boettke Peter J. ED - William N. Butos PY - 2010 Y1 - 2010/01/01 TI - From Neuro-Hayekians to subjectivist Hayekians: A reply to Horwitz and Koppl T2 - The Social Science of Hayek's ‘The Sensory Order’ T3 - Advances in Austrian Economics PB - Emerald Group Publishing Limited SP - 399 EP - 403 Y2 - 2024/04/24 ER -