TY - CHAP AB - AbstractChris Provis (2017) has discussed Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean and its counterpart in Confucianism. The Doctrine of the Mean informs an agent that ‘acting as a virtuous person will often be constituted by avoidance of choosing excess or deficiency’ (Provis, 2017, p. 118). Indeed, Provis (2017) argues against any act ‘oriented towards maximisation’ (p. 127). Provis’s (2017) focus is the encounter ‘between European and East Asian ethical traditions’ (p. 116). Our chapter is a response to Provis (2017). We respond to Provis (2017) by exploring a debate amongst Jewish scholars which originated in North Africa. Some of these scholars advocated Aristotle’s Mean. But others advocated forsaking that Mean and pursuing the extreme. VL - 23 SN - 978-1-83982-777-8, 978-1-83982-776-1/1529-2096 DO - 10.1108/S1529-209620200000023008 UR - https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-209620200000023008 AU - Schwartz Michael AU - Comer Debra R. ED - Michael Schwartz ED - Howard Harris PY - 2020 Y1 - 2020/01/01 TI - Forsaking the Mean for the Extreme: A Response to Provis T2 - War, Peace and Organizational Ethics T3 - Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations PB - Emerald Publishing Limited SP - 151 EP - 162 Y2 - 2024/03/29 ER -