Citizen Journalism and Police Legitimacy: Does Recording the Police Make a Difference?

Abstract

Purpose

This chapter examines how citizen journalism affects perceptions of legitimacy among local residents and police officers.

Methodology/approach

Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews with residents and police officers.

Findings

Local residents are mostly willing to obey police commands, but a lack of trust in the police and fear of retaliation hinder willingness to cooperate with the police. Citizens’ willingness to follow police orders is mostly a way for them to end the encounter as quickly as possible so the contact will not extend for a prolonged period of time and cause even more serious consequences. Citizens have recorded the police in the past when they witnessed officers not following proper procedures. The police view citizens recording them as a form of defiance and while this makes policing challenging, police officers interviewed still hold high levels of self-legitimacy, most likely due to their organizational and occupational culture. Recording the police has emerged as a way for citizens to challenge police authority and legitimacy during encounters.

Originality/value

While recording the police has increased with recent technological advances, little empirical research has examined its impact on policing and police-community relations. This study connects three critical issues in policing – technology, citizen journalism, and police legitimacy – by assessing the impact of recording the police on police legitimacy in the eyes of the public and police officers. Not only does this study fill our gap in knowledge on citizens recording the police, but it also furnishes valuable implications for policy and future study.

Citation

Farmer, A.K. and Sun, I.Y. (2016), "Citizen Journalism and Police Legitimacy: Does Recording the Police Make a Difference?", The Politics of Policing: Between Force and Legitimacy (Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Vol. 21), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-613620160000021013