To read this content please select one of the options below:

Chapter One Openness and Inconclusivity in Interpretation in Narrative Inquiry: Dimensions of the Social/Personal

Narrative Inquirers in the Midst of Meaning-making: Interpretive Acts of Teacher Educators

ISBN: 978-1-78052-924-0, eISBN: 978-1-78052-925-7

Publication date: 25 July 2012

Abstract

Purpose – In this chapter, we examine the influence of the commonplace of sociality within narrative inquiry during the process of interpretation and meaning-making. Our project was multivisioned because we were interested in what we learned about the methodology of narrative inquiry within the context of a phenomenon for inquiry (Clandinin & Connelly, 2000), which for this study was our identity as teacher educators (Bullough, 2005).

Approach – Using narrative inquiry, we interrogate our interpretive processes privileging the commonplace of sociality in examining stories of our identity as teacher educators from our own experience as teacher educators.

Findings – In our inquiry into interpretation from the orientation of the narrative commonplace of the social, four points of understanding emerged: (1) interpretation within the methodology of narrative inquiry is living and interpretation exists in the midst; (2) all three dimensions of the narrative inquiry space are always part of the process regardless of the commonplace under consideration; (3) if we look inward/outward in the process of interpretation, it always leads us back to the relational; and (4) when we deepen the analytic process, ethical issues, and therefore renewed grappling with our identity, emerge.

Research implications – Narrative inquiry at every phase – design, data collection, analysis, and representation – is a form of living and analysis and interpretation. As well, representation must allow space for the holistic and organic quality that this form of inquiry demands in the development and communication of ideas.

Value – The study points to the ways in which research on humans’ action and interaction returns to the relational and ethical even when that is not the focus of the research. Further, our response to narrative inquiry is not always analysis but often turns to story instead.

Keywords

Citation

Pinnegar, S. and Lynn Hamilton, M. (2012), "Chapter One Openness and Inconclusivity in Interpretation in Narrative Inquiry: Dimensions of the Social/Personal", Chan, E., Keyes, D. and Ross, V. (Ed.) Narrative Inquirers in the Midst of Meaning-making: Interpretive Acts of Teacher Educators (Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 16), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3687(2012)0000016005

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited