Mapping the Purposes of Comparative and International Education Research: A Comparative Study of Four Leading Journals

Abstract

In recent years, the field of comparative and international education (CIE) has experienced an outburst of self-reflective papers wherein comparativists study the nature of the field and map its content. This study contributes to this trend by drawing attention to a previously unstudied aspect of CIE: its purpose. Using Arnove’s dimensions as a starting point to create five new purpose categories, four prominent CIE journals are surveyed to test whether the pragmatic history of CIE is evident in its current body of research. In this process, a complete and clear genetic mapping of the journals is created, which explores their similarities and differences, as well as the changes in their content over time. Findings indicate that the pragmatic purpose of CIE dominates, though it is primarily emancipatory and transformative in its prescription. Furthermore, articles rooted in specific situational contexts were more prominent than expected considering the comparative and international nature of the field.

Citation

Sell, S.A. (2016), "Mapping the Purposes of Comparative and International Education Research: A Comparative Study of Four Leading Journals", Annual Review of Comparative and International Education 2015 (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 28), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 25-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920150000028001