TY  - CHAP
AB  - Abstract Extreme events are the occasion for many people’s encounters with climate change. Though causation is complex and no one event is directly attributable to climate change, when we consider Cassandra, we can consider what people encounter in assistance after an extreme event. This chapter takes the case of assistance to displaced people after Katrina to explore how care and surveillance were intertwined. Methods include analysis of government documents as well as interviews. When we consider assistance people receive, we often focus on the intended assistance and how it worked or did not. Evaluation is difficult, not least because criteria for determining what it means to work are uncertain. However, if we include the process of gaining assistance as part of the experience, we broaden concerns from the instrumental outcomes to the mixed messages people get in assistance. Assistance appears in a context, where the most vulnerable people have reasons to mistrust government and nonprofits, and where in the United States assistance has come intertwined with supervisory rules, a focus on getting people to work, and a need to manage criminal histories. Trust in government may be limited, emergency care can operate outside ordinary legal frameworks when providers are new, and legal accountability for assistance may be experienced as confining, despite caregivers’ intent.
VL  - 68
SN  - 978-1-78560-299-3, 978-1-78560-298-6/1059-4337
DO  - 10.1108/S1059-433720150000068004
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720150000068004
AU  - Sterett Susan M.
PY  - 2015
Y1  - 2015/01/01
TI  - Disaster Assistance and Legal Accountability: Care and Surveillance
T2  - Special Issue Cassandra’s Curse: The Law and Foreseeable Future Disasters
T3  - Studies in Law, Politics, and Society
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 95
EP  - 123
Y2  - 2024/04/18
ER  -