Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Mitigation versus individualism: Examining judges’ capital sentencing decisions

Ross Kleinstuber

Studies in Law, Politics, and Society

ISBN: 978-1-78350-785-6, eISBN: 978-1-78350-786-3

ISSN: 1059-4337

Publication date: 1 January 2014

Abstract

The very contextual nature of most mitigating evidence runs counter to America’s individualistic culture. Prior research has found that capital jurors are unreceptive to most mitigating circumstances, but no research has examined the capital sentencing decisions of trial judges. This study fills that gap through a content analysis of eight judicial sentencing opinions from Delaware. The findings indicate that judges typically dismiss contextualizing evidence in their sentencing opinions and instead focus predominately on the defendant’s culpability. This finding calls into question the ability of guided discretion statutes to ensure the consideration of mitigation and limit arbitrariness in the death penalty.

Keywords

  • Capital punishment
  • Mitigation
  • Judges
  • Sentencing
  • Hegemonic individualism

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank R. J. Maratea, Aaron Kupchik, Benjamin D. Fleury-Steiner, William J. Bowers, and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript and the attorneys and court staff members who provided access to the data used in this study. This research was made possible by funding provided by a fellowship from the Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice at the University of Delaware and a grant from the Proteus Action League.

Citation

Kleinstuber, R. (2014), "Mitigation versus individualism: Examining judges’ capital sentencing decisions", Studies in Law, Politics, and Society (Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 63), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 183-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-4337(2014)0000063005

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes

You may be able to access teaching notes by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here