Impact of Bonus Depreciation on Capital Expenditures

Advances in Taxation

ISBN: 978-1-78714-524-5, eISBN: 978-1-78714-523-8

ISSN: 1058-7497

Publication date: 18 September 2017

Abstract

Bonus depreciation was enacted by the United States Congress and signed into law in 2002 largely in response to the economic malaise that engulfed the U.S. economy after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. We investigate whether bonus depreciation, a capital asset expensing allowance under the U.S. federal income tax code, impacts the level of business investment in property, plant, and equipment in the time periods that followed 9-11 in comparison to other earlier time periods. Based on the empirical evidence, the bonus depreciation policy has a positive effect on capital expenditures only in the period in which this policy was legislatively anticipated, specifically the period spanning the last quarter of 2001 and the first quarter of 2002. Otherwise, we find no significant increase in capital expenditures during the period that this special depreciation provision policy is initially in place from 2002 to 2005. Although bonus depreciation is re-enacted in response to the fiscal distress and recession that began in 2007, capital expenditures actually decline during the recovery era, a period following the post-2008 subprime mortgage crisis. Though Congress continues to temporarily re-enact bonus depreciation on an annual basis through December 31, 2014, there is no strong evidence that capital investment is positively impacted. Instead, the empirical results show that factors that positively affect the level of companies’ capital expenditures include capital intensity, cost of capital, amount of cash holdings, changes in sales and loans. Our empirical results invite the question of Congress’ intended goal in re-instating bonus depreciation for 2015 through 2019.

Keywords

Citation

MacPhail, C., Emekter, R. and Jirasakuldech, B. (2017), "Impact of Bonus Depreciation on Capital Expenditures", Advances in Taxation (Advances in Taxation, Vol. 24), Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 125-161. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1058-749720170000024003

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017 Emerald Publishing Limited

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.