The politics of neglect: Path selection and development in nanotechnology innovation

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the development of a technology path in the nanotube (NT) field – one of the most well-developed areas of nanotechnology. Although early developments suggested that there were equally viable pathways related to the development of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and others made with organic molecules and polymers, carbon-based technologies became valorized. We show how the carbon science path developed and try to unpack how it happened. We argue that it was not due to the inherent efficiency or applications of CNTs, but to sociopolitical dynamics. Even though much intellectual property research focuses on patent-level analysis, we underscore the importance of patent categories as key cognitive elements that organize the different knowledge domains within the world of NT patenting. We show that interlinkages between patent categories are crucial to the formation and development of a particular technology path. In unpacking the selection of the carbon science path, we highlight the key role played by a cadre of star scientists and the political neglect of alternative pathways as the field herded toward the CNT path.

Citation

Lounsbury, M., Wry, T. and Devereaux Jennings, P. (2010), "The politics of neglect: Path selection and development in nanotechnology innovation", Libecap, G.D., Thursby, M. and Hoskinson, S. (Ed.) Spanning Boundaries and Disciplines: University Technology Commercialization in the Idea Age (Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth, Vol. 21), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 27-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-4736(2010)0000021005