TY  - CHAP
AB  - Purpose – Using Whitehead's notion of prehension in a critical reappraisal of phenomenology, a different kind of understanding of subjectification and objectification is being proposed in which subjectification is that which enables action as a multiplicity or virtuality, and objectification enables actuality.Approach – A critical engagement with literature on objects, including Gabriel de Tarde, Alfred North Whitehead, Martin Heidegger and Graham Harman, is used to develop an original conception of objectification and subjectification. This is applied to debates about objectification in pornography.Findings – This approach enables us to better understand the theoretical underpinnings of empirical philosophies such as Actor Network Theory in support of the argument that objects are capable of action. While subjectification is folded within the process of prehension as the opening of the virtual, it is logically possible to argue that objects are a matter of concern for ethics. This also means that in terms of the pornography debate, the pornographic object as such can be held accountable. We do not have to accept the instrumentalist argument that ‘what you do with it defines its ethics’.Originality/value – The argument that objects are capable of action has thus far not been pursued in relation to questions of ethics as opposed to politics.
VL  - 12
SN  - 978-1-78052-878-6, 978-1-78052-879-3/1042-3192
DO  - 10.1108/S1042-3192(2012)0000012013
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/S1042-3192(2012)0000012013
AU  - van Loon Joost
ED  - Kevin Love
PY  - 2012
Y1  - 2012/01/01
TI  - The Agency of Ethical Objects
T2  - Ethics in Social Research
T3  - Studies in Qualitative Methodology
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 189
EP  - 205
Y2  - 2024/04/24
ER  -