To read this content please select one of the options below:

The Intersection of Violence and Land Inequality in Modern Colombia

The Politics of Land

ISBN: 978-1-78756-428-2, eISBN: 978-1-78756-427-5

Publication date: 13 March 2019

Abstract

Colombia has one of the highest levels of inequality in landholding in the world. This inequality has persisted in spite of numerous state-led land reform efforts, which leads to the question: why has it been so difficult to reverse unequal land distribution in Colombia? To answer this question, the chapter examines the role of the state, non-state armed groups, land inequality, land reform efforts, and a history of violence to reveal the relationship between land, inequality and violence in Colombia. This chapter explores the nature of this relationship to understand Colombia’s enduring inequality and to inform theoretical approaches to statehood and power. Rather than reducing state capacity to common Weberian binary constructions of state and statelessness, I explore how state capacity takes on different forms in different regions of Colombia – analyzing how various actors shape land inequality and violence across the territory. Using a comprehensive longitudinal panel data set of displaced persons, I use a negative binomial regression model to demonstrate how land reform, land inequality, and a history of violence have directly affected current displacement of citizens. I argue that several constellations of powerful social actors have at various points converged to control land, through non-state armed groups, to exert a local form of logistical control outside the scope of the federal state, deeply affecting the dynamics violence across different territories. These groups have subsequently engaged in a land grabbing process that has resulted in a reverse form of land reform – leading to persisting inequality in Colombia.

Keywords

Citation

Nelson, G. (2019), "The Intersection of Violence and Land Inequality in Modern Colombia", The Politics of Land (Research in Political Sociology, Vol. 26), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 229-257. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0895-993520190000026017

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited