To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Can Group-Incentives Without Participation Survive the Free-Rider Problem? A View From the Lab

Sharing Ownership, Profits, and Decision-Making in the 21st Century

ISBN: 978-1-78190-750-4

Publication date: 9 December 2013

Abstract

Purpose

Group incentive schemes have been shown to be positively associated with firm performance but it remains an open question whether this association can be explained by the motivating characteristics of the group-incentive scheme itself, or if this is due to factors that tend to accompany group-incentive schemes. We use a controlled experiment to directly test if group-incentive schemes can motivate sustained individual effort in the absence of rules, norms, and institutions that are known to mitigate free-riding behavior.

Design/methodology/approach

We use a controlled lab experiment that randomly assigns subjects to one of three compensation contracts used to incentivize an onerous effort task. Two of the compensation contracts are group-incentive schemes where subjects have an incentive to free-ride on the efforts of their coworkers, and the third (control) is a flat-wage contract.

Findings

We find that both group-incentive schemes resulted in sustained, higher performance relative to the flat-wage compensation contract. Further, we do not find evidence of free-riding behavior under the two group-incentive schemes.

Research limitations/implications

Although we do find sustained cooperation/performance over the three work periods of our experiment under the group-incentive schemes, further testing would be required to evaluate whether group-incentive schemes can sustain cooperation over a longer time horizon without complementary norms, policies, or institutions that mitigate free-riding.

Originality/value

By unambiguously showing that group-incentive schemes can, by themselves, motivate workers to provide sustained levels of effort, this suggests that the “1/n problem” may be, in part, an artifact of the rational-actor modeling conventions.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Louis O. Kelso Fellowship program and the Foundation for Enterprise Development. I would like to thank Joseph Blasi, Douglas Kruse, Eric Olsen, Fidan Kurtulus, Richard Freeman, Jeffrey Carpenter, Peter Hans Matthews, Jim Warner, John Spraggon, Mike Carr, John Lanz, the anonymous referee and the participants at the 2011 Midyear Fellows Workshop at Rutgers University, the 2011 Summer Beyster Fellowship Symposium, and the 2011 ICAPE conference at UMass-Amherst for their many helpful comments received on previous drafts. Any and all errors in the chapter are mine.

Citation

Mellizo, P. (2013), "Can Group-Incentives Without Participation Survive the Free-Rider Problem? A View From the Lab", Sharing Ownership, Profits, and Decision-Making in the 21st Century (Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory & Labor-Managed Firms, Vol. 14), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 27-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0885-3339(2013)0000014003

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited