To read this content please select one of the options below:

Digitalization Versus Regulation: How Disruptive Digital Communication Technologies Alter Institutional Contexts Through Public Interest Framing

Kerem Gurses (Ramon Llull University, Spain)
Basak Yakis-Douglas (King's College London, UK)
Pinar Ozcan (University of Oxford, UK)

Digital Transformation and Institutional Theory

ISBN: 978-1-80262-222-5, eISBN: 978-1-80262-221-8

Publication date: 23 September 2022

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate how digital technology disruptors and the incumbents who stand to be disrupted by them frame their arguments to transform or sustain existing institutional frameworks to enable or deter the market entry of these technologies. Using a longitudinal, comparative case analysis of three digital technologies – namely, voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), cloud antenna, and over-the-top (OTT) technologies – we explore how stakeholders use public interest frames for this purpose. We find that entrepreneurs use three specific frames to drive institutional change for the successful adoption of digital technologies in the presence of established incumbents and powerful regulators: frames that emphasize the broad public appeal of the new digital technology; frames that emphasize efficiency, democracy, and technological advancement; and frames that emphasize present as well as future benefits to the public. We find that constructing interpretations of what serves the public interest is the primary tactic used by disruptors to gain market entry, and an equally popular weapon for incumbents to block the entry of new digital technologies. These interpretations lead to a framing contest aimed at influencing regulators and obtaining a more favorable institutional environment. Our empirical findings illustrate that new digital technologies themselves are not the sole contributors to institutional change. Rather, institutional outcomes associated with the introduction of new digital technologies are shaped by how disruptors and incumbents use public interest frames and how regulators react to these frames.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments

We would like to convey deep gratitude to Kevin Morrell and Ken Okamura for their very helpful contributions on crucial elements of this paper.

Citation

Gurses, K., Yakis-Douglas, B. and Ozcan, P. (2022), "Digitalization Versus Regulation: How Disruptive Digital Communication Technologies Alter Institutional Contexts Through Public Interest Framing", Gegenhuber, T., Logue, D., Hinings, C.R.(B). and Barrett, M. (Ed.) Digital Transformation and Institutional Theory (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 83), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 133-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000083006

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022 Kerem Gurses, Basak Yakis-Douglas and Pinar Ozcan