TY  - CHAP
AB  - Abstract While the use of the pragmatic sociology of critique has enjoyed increasing academic popularity, the relationship between justification and broader power relations remains unclear. Recent attention to the concept of ‘domination’ suggests the need for a greater focus on how employed public goods reinforce prevailing social arrangements. In this article we explore the public debate over the expansion of hydraulic fracturing of shale gas (so-called ‘fracking’) in the United Kingdom (UK). This technology has generated significant debate and controversy. Through a detailed examination of public inquiries into the technology we explore how different actors employ discursive strategies to justify their claims for the expansion or rejection of fracking. Through this analysis, the article identifies how some of these justifications enjoy precedence over others within the prevailing neoliberal political regime. By explaining how such a political regime is constituted, our study contributes to better understanding how different justifications support hegemonic political ideologies.
VL  - 52
SN  - 978-1-78714-379-1, 978-1-78714-380-7/0733-558X
DO  - 10.1108/S0733-558X20170000052005
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20170000052005
AU  - Nyberg Daniel
AU  - Wright Christopher
AU  - Kirk Jacqueline
PY  - 2017
Y1  - 2017/01/01
TI  - Re-Producing a Neoliberal Political Regime: Competing Justifications and Dominance in Disputing Fracking
T2  - Justification, Evaluation and Critique in the Study of Organizations
T3  - Research in the Sociology of Organizations
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 143
EP  - 171
Y2  - 2024/04/25
ER  -