TY  - CHAP
AB  - Abstract In this article, we make the point that managerial domination as described by pragmatic sociology is an appropriate notion to make sense of complex forms of domination in contemporary organizations. Based on Lemieux’s work on ‘grammars’, we complement approaches of complex domination put forward by pragmatic sociologists such as Boltanski and Thévenot. We illustrate these ideas by means of an ethnographic study of the financial intermediation industry. Our analysis sketches out an alternative conceptualization of power in such environments, and by so doing, helps us delineate the features that characterize complex financial domination. We conclude by arguing that this type of domination is the result of specific contradictions inherent to the grammars of financial intermediation.
VL  - 52
SN  - 978-1-78714-379-1, 978-1-78714-380-7/0733-558X
DO  - 10.1108/S0733-558X20170000052004
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20170000052004
AU  - Taupin Benjamin
AU  - Lenglet Marc
PY  - 2017
Y1  - 2017/01/01
TI  - ‘Public’ Versus ‘Natural’ Grammars: Complex Domination in the Financial Intermediation Industry
T2  - Justification, Evaluation and Critique in the Study of Organizations
T3  - Research in the Sociology of Organizations
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 109
EP  - 142
Y2  - 2024/04/25
ER  -