To read this content please select one of the options below:

Matching Up: Producing Proximal Service in a Los Angeles Restaurant

Research in the Sociology of Work

ISBN: 978-1-78635-406-8, eISBN: 978-1-78635-405-1

Publication date: 19 August 2016

Abstract

In high-end interactive service work settings, asymmetries between workers and customers are typically reflected in the service interaction. Workers must carefully control their emotional and aesthetic displays towards customers by relying on protocol provided by management. Customers, in turn, need not reciprocate such acts. By contrast, this paper theorizes service interactions that, paradoxically, aim to narrow the social distance between those on either side of the counter. Drawing on ethnographic data from a higher-end Los Angeles restaurant, I introduce the concept of proximal service as performed relationships in which server and served engage in peer-like interactions in a commercial setting. I show how management structures this drama through hiring, training, and shopfloor policies, all of which encourage select workers to approach customers using informal, flexible, and peer-like performances. I close by discussing how a branded experience of service amongst equals relates to symbolic exclusion and social inequality, and suggest that proximal service may be on the rise within upscale, urban service establishments seeking to offer a more “authentic” consumption experience.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Ashley Mears, the editor of the RSW Journal, and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on previous drafts of this paper. I also thank Ruben Hernandez-Leon, Jack Katz, Rachel Sherman, Chris Tilly, Christine Yano, and members of the UCLA Ethnography Working Group for their assistance with this paper at various stages. All remaining errors are my own.

Citation

Wilson, E. (2016), "Matching Up: Producing Proximal Service in a Los Angeles Restaurant", Research in the Sociology of Work (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 29), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 99-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320160000029015

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited