TY  - CHAP
AB  - Abstract Intellectual humility and religious conviction are often posed as antagonistic binaries; the former associated with science, reason, inclusive universality, and liberal secularism, the latter with superstition, dogma, exclusive particularity, and rigid traditionalism. Despite popular images of white American evangelicals as the embodied antithesis of intellectual humility, responsiveness to facts, and openness to the other, this article demonstrates how evangelicals can and do practice intellectual humility in public life while simultaneously holding fast to particularistic religious convictions. Drawing on textual analysis and multi-site ethnographic data, it demonstrates how observed evangelical practices of transposable and segmented reflexivity map onto pluralist, domain-specific conceptualizations of intellectual humility in the philosophical and psychological literature. It further argues that the effective practice of intellectual humility in the interests of ethical democracy does not require religious actors to abandon particularistic religious reasons for universal secular ones. Rather, particularistic religious convictions can motivate effective practices of intellectual humility and thereby support democratic pluralism, inclusivity, and solidarity across difference. More broadly, it aims to challenge, or at least complicate, the widespread notion that increasing strength of religious conviction always moves in lockstep with increasing dogmatism, tribalism, and intellectual unreasonableness.
VL  - 36
SN  - 978-1-78973-949-7, 978-1-78973-950-3/0198-8719
DO  - 10.1108/S0198-871920190000036004
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-871920190000036004
AU  - Markofski Wes
PY  - 2019
Y1  - 2019/01/01
TI  - Reflexive Evangelicalism
T2  - Religion, Humility, and Democracy in a Divided America
T3  - Political Power and Social Theory
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 47
EP  - 74
Y2  - 2024/04/24
ER  -