To read this content please select one of the options below:

Codification and Ethos of Office: Contextualising a Codex-solution Introduced in the Danish Central Administration

Bureaucracy and Society in Transition

ISBN: 978-1-78743-284-0, eISBN: 978-1-78743-283-3

Publication date: 8 October 2018

Abstract

In this chapter, we contextualise an ethical codex introduced in the Danish Central Administration. As a management tool, the codex is intended to curb a mounting distrust induced by a number of political-administrative scandals. This is attempted via a revitalisation of classical bureaucratic duties. At the same time, the codex’s attempt at restoring trust is challenged by a number of obstacles. Launching our exploration from an ethos of office-perspective, we contextualise the codex in three dimensions: an organisational dimension, a semantic dimension and a training dimension. From this three-pronged analysis, we show how a number of historical and contemporary obstacles work counter to the codex’s stated attempt to revitalise the ethos of the civil servants. Building on these analyses, we discuss the tensions between official and private selves in particular ethical training exercises as well as the implications the codex brings with it, including a possible obscuring of political-administrative responsibility.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Emeritus Ian Hunter for making extensive comments on an earlier version of this chapter. Also we would like to thank our editors and two reviewers for helpful guidance and comments. Finally, we would like to express our profound gratitude to Professor Emeritus Jørgen Grønnegaard Christensen and The Bo Smith Investigation Committee for giving us access to the Committee’s dataset.

Citation

Lopdrup-Hjorth, T. and Obling, A.R. (2018), "Codification and Ethos of Office: Contextualising a Codex-solution Introduced in the Danish Central Administration", Bureaucracy and Society in Transition (Comparative Social Research, Vol. 33), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 265-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0195-631020180000033017

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited