To read this content please select one of the options below:

The dividend puzzle: A laboratory investigation

Experiments in Financial Economics

ISBN: 978-1-78350-140-3, eISBN: 978-1-78350-141-0

Publication date: 16 January 2014

Abstract

Purpose

We investigate the implications of the misalignment between manager and shareholder interests and the effects of initial ownership stakes and reinvestment of unpaid dividends on managerial self-dealing.

Methodology

We collect and analyze data from controlled laboratory experiments with an experimental setting which captures the role of ownership in managerial considerations.

Findings

We see the emergence of both investor-aligned outcomes and managerial self-dealing outcomes. We find that increasing managers’ initial endowment of shares makes it harder for managers to coordinate on an outcome and lowers return on investment. Moreover, allowing managers to reinvest unpaid dividends results in a transfer of wealth to management.

Research limitations

The results and the conclusions are drawn upon data from the particular setting we investigate. Generalizing them beyond the specific setting should be done with caution.

Practical implications

Higher managerial ownership stake means that managers have a greater incentive to reward shareholders, but we find that it may also imply a more difficult coordination problem between managers – sometimes to the detriment of shareholders.

Originality

This study is the first to consider the direct relationship between managers’ portfolios and voting decisions regarding dividends and investment levels.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Tibor Neugebauer for making this research possible. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (PDR 09 044) und die Université Du Luxembourg (Project IDIAM).

Citation

Füllbrunn, S. and Haruvy, E. (2014), "The dividend puzzle: A laboratory investigation", Experiments in Financial Economics (Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 16), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 87-110. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-2306(2013)0000016005

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited