To read this content please select one of the options below:

Economic Anthropology After the Great Debate: The Role and Evolution of Institutionalist Thought

Political Economy, Neoliberalism, and the Prehistoric Economies of Latin America

ISBN: 978-1-78190-058-1, eISBN: 978-1-78190-059-8

Publication date: 4 October 2012

Abstract

Purpose – Inspired by “old” institutional arguments, this chapter presents the ideas of both the “old” and “new” institutional perspective as their arguments appear in the economic anthropology literature following the substantivist–formalist debate of the 1960s.

Design/methodology/approach – During the 1960s the substantivist–formalist debate, otherwise known as the “Great Debate,” thrust institutional thought to the forefront of economic anthropology. By the close of the 1960s, the substantivist–formalist debate passed unresolved. Institutional economic anthropology reached a crossroad – it could continue the legacy of the substantivism as represented by “old” institutionalism or follow the path of “new” institutional economics. Against the long shadow of the “Great Debate,” this chapter identifies key epistemological ideas that are present within the recent history of the institutional economic anthropology literature.

Findings – On the basis of epistemological arguments, the chapter suggests that if the substantivist–formalist debate, often times referred to as the “Great Debate,” is ever to achieve closure, then practitioners of institutional economic anthropology would benefit by moving beyond “new” institutional thought.

Originality/value – This chapter provides a unique evaluation of the institutional perspective within the history of economic anthropology. Residing within this history are clear and poignant distinctions between the “old” and “new” institutional perspectives. As a result, this chapter seeks to bring to social scientists interested in institutional economists, important insights from economic anthropology that may have otherwise gone unnoticed.

Keywords

Citation

Elardo, J.A. (2012), "Economic Anthropology After the Great Debate: The Role and Evolution of Institutionalist Thought", Matejowsky, T. and Wood, D.C. (Ed.) Political Economy, Neoliberalism, and the Prehistoric Economies of Latin America (Research in Economic Anthropology, Vol. 32), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 53-83. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-1281(2012)0000032007

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited