A common charge against qualitative researchers in general and interactionist researchers in particular is that they produce descriptive, a-theoretical accounts of group life. We consider the problem of “analytic interruptus” in contemporary symbolic interactionism – that is, a failure to move beyond analyses of individual cases – and offer a potential to a solution via the pursuit of a generic social process (GSP) research agenda. A GSP approach involves developing, assessing, and revising concepts from the close scrutiny of empirical instances across diverse contexts. By considering criticisms of GSPs from feminist and postmodernist scholars, a more informed, qualified, and better-situated approach to the framework becomes possible. We argue that GSPs remain a quintessential analytical tool to explore subcultural realities and build formal theories of the social world.
McLuhan, A. and Puddephatt, A. (2019), "Overcoming “Analytic Interruptus”: The Genesis, Development, and Future of Generic Social Processes", The Interaction Order (Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 50), Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-239620190000050003Download as .RIS
Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited