TY  - CHAP
AB  - Gary Mongiovi accurately cites my thesis, presented in Freeman (2010a) (henceforth referred to as Positivist Marxism and abbreviated to PM), that “capitalism's inner laws express themselves in … different ways during booms and during crises” and that “When the business cycle is in an upswing … the tensions and contradictions that will eventually interrupt the process of capital accumulation are camouflaged by the commodity form, and so appear as natural laws of motion.” He also expresses general agreement with this thesis, but complains that the way I present it is “marred by a gratuitous methodological argument” which is “misleading and therefore stand[s] in the way of productive discussion.” The methodological argument in question is that no theory based on the method of static equilibrium can provide an explanation of endogenous capitalist crisis; this is the main issue I address in this response. PM applies this argument in order to examine a theoretical current that dominates Western, academic, Marxism. This current interprets Marx's theory as a variant of general equilibrium. In this response I refer to it as simultaneist Marxism (SM).
VL  - 27
SN  - 978-1-78052-255-5, 978-1-78052-254-8/0161-7230
DO  - 10.1108/S0161-7230(2011)0000027013
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/S0161-7230(2011)0000027013
AU  - Freeman Alan
ED  - Paul Zarembka
ED  - Radhika Desai
PY  - 2011
Y1  - 2011/01/01
TI  - Crisis, Marxism, and Economic Laws: A Response to Gary Mongiovi
T2  - Revitalizing Marxist Theory for Today's Capitalism
T3  - Research in Political Economy
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 285
EP  - 296
Y2  - 2021/03/09
ER  -