To read this content please select one of the options below:

Thermal modeling of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing using graph theory

Alex Riensche (Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virgina Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, Virginia, USA and Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA)
Jordan Severson (Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA)
Reza Yavari (Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA)
Nicholas L. Piercy (Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA)
Kevin D. Cole (Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA)
Prahalada Rao (Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virgina Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, Virginia, USA and Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA)

Rapid Prototyping Journal

ISSN: 1355-2546

Article publication date: 12 August 2022

Issue publication date: 27 January 2023

453

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to develop, apply and validate a mesh-free graph theory–based approach for rapid thermal modeling of the directed energy deposition (DED) additive manufacturing (AM) process.

Design/methodology/approach

In this study, the authors develop a novel mesh-free graph theory–based approach to predict the thermal history of the DED process. Subsequently, the authors validated the graph theory predicted temperature trends using experimental temperature data for DED of titanium alloy parts (Ti-6Al-4V). Temperature trends were tracked by embedding thermocouples in the substrate. The DED process was simulated using the graph theory approach, and the thermal history predictions were validated based on the data from the thermocouples.

Findings

The temperature trends predicted by the graph theory approach have mean absolute percentage error of approximately 11% and root mean square error of 23°C when compared to the experimental data. Moreover, the graph theory simulation was obtained within 4 min using desktop computing resources, which is less than the build time of 25 min. By comparison, a finite element–based model required 136 min to converge to similar level of error.

Research limitations/implications

This study uses data from fixed thermocouples when printing thin-wall DED parts. In the future, the authors will incorporate infrared thermal camera data from large parts.

Practical implications

The DED process is particularly valuable for near-net shape manufacturing, repair and remanufacturing applications. However, DED parts are often afflicted with flaws, such as cracking and distortion. In DED, flaw formation is largely governed by the intensity and spatial distribution of heat in the part during the process, often referred to as the thermal history. Accordingly, fast and accurate thermal models to predict the thermal history are necessary to understand and preclude flaw formation.

Originality/value

This paper presents a new mesh-free computational thermal modeling approach based on graph theory (network science) and applies it to DED. The approach eschews the tedious and computationally demanding meshing aspect of finite element modeling and allows rapid simulation of the thermal history in additive manufacturing. Although the graph theory has been applied to thermal modeling of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), there are distinct phenomenological differences between DED and LPBF that necessitate substantial modifications to the graph theory approach.

Keywords

Citation

Riensche, A., Severson, J., Yavari, R., Piercy, N.L., Cole, K.D. and Rao, P. (2023), "Thermal modeling of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing using graph theory", Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 324-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2021-0184

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles