Design and 3D printing customized guides for orthopaedic surgery – lessons learned

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to fill a research gap by presenting design and 3D printing guidelines and considerations which apply to the development process of patient-specific osteotomy guides for orthopaedic surgery.

Design/methodology/approach

Analysis of specific constraints related to patient-specific surgical guides design and 3D printing, lessons learned during the development process of osteotomy guides for orthopaedic surgery, literature review of recent studies in the field and data gathered from questioning a group of surgeons for capturing their preferences in terms of surgical guides design corresponding to precise functionality (materializing cutting trajectories, ensuring unique positioning and stable fixation during surgery), were all used to extract design recommendations.

Findings

General design rules for patient-specific osteotomy guides were inferred from examining each step of the design process applied in several case studies in relation to how these guides should be designed to fulfill medical and manufacturing (fused deposition modelling process) constraints. Literature was also investigated for finding other information than the simple reference that the surgical guide is modelled as negative of the bone. It was noticed that literature is focussed more on presenting and discussing medical issues and on assessing surgical outcomes, but hardly at all on guides’ design and design for additive manufacturing aspects. Moreover, surgeons’ opinion was investigated to collect data on different design aspects, as well as interest and willingness to use such 3D-printed surgical guides in training and surgery.

Practical implications

The study contains useful rules and recommendations for engineers involved in designing and 3D printing patient-specific osteotomy guides.

Originality/value

A synergetic approach to identify general rules and recommendations for the patient-specific surgical guides design is presented. Specific constraints are identified and analysed using three case studies of wrist, femur and foot osteotomies. Recent literature is reviewed and surgeons’ opinion is investigated.

Citation

Popescu, D., Laptoiu, D., Marinescu, R. and Botezatu, I. (2018), "Design and 3D printing customized guides for orthopaedic surgery – lessons learned", Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 901-913. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-05-2017-0099