Effect of layer thickness on irreversible thermal expansion and interlayer strength in fused deposition modeling

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to examine the impact of layer thickness on irreversible thermal expansion, residual stress and mechanical properties of additively manufactured parts.

Design/methodology/approach

Samples were printed at several layer thicknesses, and their irreversible thermal expansion, tensile strength and flexural strength were determined.

Findings

Irreversible thermal strain increases with decreasing layer thickness, up to 22 per cent strain. Tensile and flexural strengths exhibited a peak at a layer thickness of 200 μm although the maximum was not statistically significant at a 95 per cent confidence interval. Tensile strength was 54 to 97 per cent of reported values for injection molded acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and 29 to 73 per cent of those reported for bulk ABS. Flexural strength was 18 to 41 per cent of reported flexural strength for bulk ABS.

Practical implications

The large irreversible thermal strain exhibited that corresponding residual stresses could lead to failure of additively manufactured parts over time. Additionally, the observed irreversible thermal strains could enable thermally responsive shape in additively manufactured parts. Variation in mechanical properties with layer thickness will also affect manufactured parts.

Originality/value

Tailorable irreversible thermal strain of this magnitude has not been previously reported for additively manufactured parts. This strain occurs in parts made with both high-end and consumer grade fused deposition modeling machines. Additionally, the impact of layer thickness on tensile and flexural properties of additively manufactured parts has received limited attention in the literature.

Citation

D’Amico, A.A., Debaie, A. and Peterson, A.M. (2017), "Effect of layer thickness on irreversible thermal expansion and interlayer strength in fused deposition modeling", Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 943-953. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-05-2016-0077