Deconstructing the corporate psychopath: an examination of deceptive behavior

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether business students deceive others more often than non-business students.

Design/methodology/approach

A cheap talk experiment and an ethics questionnaire are employed to examine the subject’s behavior. Fundamental differences, such as psychopathic personality, are used to examine their role in deceptive and unethical behavior.

Findings

The results show that business students deceive others for personal gain more often than non-business students when there is the most to gain; however, business students find deception committed by others as unethical. Business students exhibit more psychopathic tendencies compared to non-business students, including being more likely to fit the prototypical psychopath profile. This fundamental difference in psychopathy can help explain why individuals deceive others and behave unethically.

Practical implications

These results have important implications for the business industry and the design of policies.

Originality/value

Thus, this study endeavors to advance the literature on fundamental distinctions between those who work in high levels of organizations and how this fundamental difference impacts decision making.

Citation

Shank, C.A. (2018), "Deconstructing the corporate psychopath: an examination of deceptive behavior", Review of Behavioral Finance, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-03-2017-0028