To read this content please select one of the options below:

Dual audit, audit firm independence, and auditor conservatism

Chan-Jane Lin (Department of Accounting, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan)
Hsiao-Lun Lin (Department of Accountancy, National Taipei University, Taipei, Taiwan)
Ai-Ru Yen (Department of Accounting, Business Law, and Finance, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, Illinois, USA)

Review of Accounting and Finance

ISSN: 1475-7702

Article publication date: 4 February 2014

7579

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine whether China's unique dual audit policy affects one specific aspect of audit quality: auditor conservatism. In China, listed companies issuing B/H-shares in addition to A-shares must release two financial reports – one based on Chinese accounting standards and the other based on international accounting standards (ISA). The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) further requires that the financial reports following Chinese accounting standards should be audited by a domestic CPA firm, and the financial reports following ISA should be audited by an approved overseas CPA firm. This study investigates whether the dual audit requirement induces more auditor conservatism.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on a sample of 7,046 firm-year observations that issue A-shares from 2001 to 2006, the authors empirically test whether the dual audit requirement induces more auditor conservatism, measured by the level of discretionary accruals.

Findings

The authors find the dual audit requirement significantly restricts the use of income-increasing discretionary accruals but not income-decreasing discretionary accruals. Moreover, financial reporting becomes most conservative when two auditors are from two un-affiliated audit firms. Nevertheless, the difference-in-difference analysis fails to show a significant decrease in auditor conservatism after the revocation of the dual audit rule for the treatment group with dual audit before but no dual audit after 2007 comparing to the control group that experience no change in 2007.

Originality/value

First, the previous studies examine issues regarding the effects of supervision pressure through experimental setting. The authors extend the literature by examining empirically the impact of perceived peer pressure on auditor conservatism. Second, the findings from China regarding the effect of the dual audit system on auditor conservatism serve as a reference for other emerging markets that have not yet established sound audit systems.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the helpful comments and suggestions from workshop participants at the 2008 Accounting Theory and Practice Conference in Taipei, the 2009 China Accounting and Finance Review International Symposium in Nanjing, and the 2011 American Accounting Association annual meeting. Chan-Jane Lin would like to thank the financial support from the National Science Council in Taiwan (NSC96-2416-H-002-044-MY3).

Citation

Lin, C.-J., Lin, H.-L. and Yen, A.-R. (2014), "Dual audit, audit firm independence, and auditor conservatism", Review of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-06-2012-0053

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles