The future of qualitative research: unity, fragmentation or pluralism?

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to argue that in order to maintain the legitimacy of qualitative management research it is important to re-emphasise the link between epistemology and methodology and recognise that different knowledge-constituting assumptions can underpin what might on the surface seem to be very similar methodologies. This means that the ways in which any research is evaluated needs to be tied explicitly to the underlying philosophical assumptions at play and those involved in undertaking, judging and publishing research need to show increased awareness in the philosophical assumptions which underpin their judgements of research quality and a willingness to accept difference.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper is a discussion piece.

Findings

This is a discussion piece.

Originality/value

The paper aims to contribute to the debate concerning the future of qualitative methods in management research.

Citation

Duberley, J. (2015), "The future of qualitative research: unity, fragmentation or pluralism?", Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 340-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-07-2015-1299