To read this content please select one of the options below:

Fieldwork in philosophy, emancipation and researcher dis-position: A post-qualitative research exemplar

Stephen Heimans (Griffith Institute for Educational Research (GIER), Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia)

Qualitative Research Journal

ISSN: 1443-9883

Article publication date: 1 February 2016

651

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to offer an exemplar of post-qualitative “fieldwork in philosophy” research. The paper proposes features of such philosophical fieldwork and adumbrates examples of concepts that have emerged in the process of undertaking the research.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper is conceptual, drawing on an abductive approach. Post-qualitative understandings that question the validity of methodology and theory as separable entities are operationalised.

Findings

The paper provides insights into how post-qualitative research might be undertaken and what might emerge in the process.

Originality/value

This paper fulfils a need for an example of research that is post-qualitative. Additionally, the possibilities for doing “fieldwork in philosophy” are extended, as is the work of Jacque Rancière with respect to emancipation.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The research was a PhD project whose title became Characterising – (an) Education Policy, conducted through the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. The idea for working the project out as a “fieldwork in philosophy” came from Taylor Webb, and the author would like to thank him for this.

Citation

Heimans, S. (2016), "Fieldwork in philosophy, emancipation and researcher dis-position: A post-qualitative research exemplar", Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2014-0035

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles