Auditors’ search for meaningfulness in sustainability assurance work

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine auditors’ search for meaningfulness in sustainability assurance (SA) work.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors collected ethnographic data over a nine-month period from two small firms offering SA services in France between 2018 and 2019.

Findings

Auditors’ experiences of meaningfulness are facilitated by shared sustainability values among colleagues, social acknowledgement of like-minded profiles and the feeling that working in a “small firm” provides a more fulfilling and committed-to-sustainability environment than conventional assurance work in large accounting firms. The search for meaningfulness collapses when auditors realize not only the limits of their agentic and transformative capacities but also their unintended complicity in certifying the reports of companies with poor sustainability performance. Because they struggle to reconcile the assessment of their professional practice with their value system, the participants are tempted to disengage from their work by giving up a sustainability career and/or by reframing SA work as an advisory rather than a control function.

Originality/value

The authors approach SA not as an organizational project of professional expansion, through which accounting firms attempt to expand their scope of practice, but as an individual and reflexive search of aligning assurance work to their value system. Auditors’ search for meaningfulness is a strong counterpoint to the financial auditing literature, which portrays auditors as professionals with a low sense of purpose at work, but also to the literature criticizing accounting firms’ discursive processes of “depoliticization” (Malsch, 2013) and “de-emotionalization” (Rodrigue et al., 2022) of socio-environmental issues.

Citation

Gaudy, C. and Malsch, B. (2023), "Auditors’ search for meaningfulness in sustainability assurance work", Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-10-2022-0161