To read this content please select one of the options below:

The politics of profit production

Thomas Carrington (Stockholm Business School, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland)
Gunilla Eklöv Alander (Stockholm Business School, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden)

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

ISSN: 1176-6093

Article publication date: 23 February 2022

Issue publication date: 22 July 2022

432

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to analyze the process of producing a reported profit number to understand how different actors overcome the tensions arising from the often conflicting value frames that apply in different situations during this process and how the actors can benefit from the ensuing friction.

Design/methodology/approach

The tensions found in the profit production process are theorized in terms of dissonance (Stark, 2009), emphasizing how multiple voices, drawing on different value frames, contribute to the search for a profit number. The authors study this by means of a case study of a large listed company in the construction industry, where, because of how judgment pervades the profit production process, the search for profit is particularly exposed.

Findings

The authors find three important value frames – caution, control and compliance – which managers, accountants and auditors draw on in the profit production process, depending on the situation they find themselves in. With this finding, the authors contribute to the previous research on financial reporting and management work and the production of profits by demonstrating how the relationships between the involved actors – primarily the auditor–client relationship – can be characterized by principled and constructive rivalry in which competing value frames can coexist alongside each other and how the dissonance created in these situations can produce generative and productive friction.

Originality/value

Previous research has mostly focused on profit measurement, taking the existence of a “true” profit number for granted. The auditor–client negotiation literature typically suggests that actors endeavor to solve situations in a zero-sum game where different value frames are present. This paper, drawing on an incipient theoretical approach to accounting research which emphasizes multivocality and perspective, contributes to the nascent research on financial accounting and management work in general and the profit production process in particular. With empirical illustrations of the dissonance found in this process, this paper suggests that tensions resulting from dissonance (Stark, 2009) may be a resource in situations like the profit production process.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Johan Graaf, Rita Samiolo and the two anonymous reviewers for their comments, thoughts and constructive feedback on the manuscript. The authors also benefited from feedback on the manuscript from presentations at the MUSICA seminars at Stockholm University, Linnaeus University, the EGOS sub-theme Risk, Value and Virtue in the Audit Society (Copenhagen, 2017) and the EAA annual congress (Milan, 2018). The authors graciously acknowledge the financial support of Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse and Riksbankens Jubileumsfond.

Citation

Carrington, T. and Eklöv Alander, G. (2022), "The politics of profit production", Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 441-472. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-08-2020-0141

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles