To read this content please select one of the options below:

Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures: Performance evaluation of social enterprise

Belinda Luke (School of Accountancy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
Jo Barraket (Centre for Philanthropy and Non-profit Studies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
Robyn Eversole (Institute for Regional Development, University of Tasmania, Burnie, Australia)

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

ISSN: 1176-6093

Article publication date: 18 November 2013

3554

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to review the growing emphasis on quantifiable performance measures such as social return on investment (SROI) in third sector organisations – specifically, social enterprise – through a legitimacy theory lens. It then examines what social enterprises value (i.e. consider important) in terms of performance evaluation, using a case study approach.

Design/methodology/approach

Case studies involving interviews, documentary analysis, and observation, of three social enterprises at different life-cycle stages with different funding structures, were constructed to consider “what measures matter” from a practitioner's perspective.

Findings

Findings highlight a priority on quality outcomes and impacts in primarily qualitative terms to evaluate performance. Further, there is a noticeable lack of emphasis on financial measures other than basic access to financial resources to continue pursuing social goals.

Social implications

The practical challenges faced by social enterprises – many of which are small to medium sized – in evaluating performance and by implication organisational legitimacy are contrasted with measures such as SROI which are resource intensive and have inherent methodological limitations. Hence, findings suggest the limited and valuable resources of social enterprises would be better allocated towards documenting the actual outcomes and impacts as a first step, in order to evaluate social and financial performance in terms appropriate to each objective, in order to demonstrate organisational legitimacy.

Originality/value

Findings distinguish between processes which may hold symbolic legitimacy for select stakeholder groups, and processes which hold substantive, cognitive legitimacy for stakeholders more broadly, in the under-researched context of social enterprise.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr Jonathan Bader of QUT and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments in the development of this paper.

Citation

Luke, B., Barraket, J. and Eversole, R. (2013), "Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures: Performance evaluation of social enterprise", Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 10 No. 3/4, pp. 234-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-08-2012-0034

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles