To read this content please select one of the options below:

Advancing a theoretical framework for exploring heuristics and biases within HR decision-making contexts

Anthony K. Hunt (Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA)
Jia Wang (Department of Educational Administration and Human Resource Development, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA)
Amin Alizadeh (Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA)
Maja Pucelj (Faculty of Organisation Studies, Novo Mesto, Slovenia)

Personnel Review

ISSN: 0048-3486

Article publication date: 19 April 2024

Issue publication date: 16 October 2024

350

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to provide an elucidative and explanatory overview of decision-making theory that human resource management and development (HR) researchers and practitioners can use to explore the impact of heuristics and biases on organizational decisions, particularly within HR contexts.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper draws upon three theoretical resources anchored in decision-making research: the theory of bounded rationality, the heuristics and biases program, and cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST). A selective narrative review approach was adopted to identify, translate, and contextualize research findings that provide immense applicability, connection, and significance to the field and study of HR.

Findings

The authors extract key insights from the theoretical resources surveyed and illustrate the linkages between HR and decision-making research, presenting a theoretical framework to guide future research endeavors.

Practical implications

Decades of decision-making research have been distilled into a digestible and accessible framework that offers both theoretical and practical implications.

Originality/value

Heuristics are mental shortcuts that facilitate quick decisions by simplifying complexity and reducing effort needed to solve problems. Heuristic strategies can yield favorable outcomes, especially amid time and information constraints. However, heuristics can also introduce systematic judgment errors known as biases. Biases are pervasive within organizational settings and can lead to disastrous decisions. This paper provides HR scholars and professionals with a balanced, nuanced, and integrative framework to better understand heuristics and biases and explore their organizational impact. To that end, a forward-looking and direction-setting research agenda is presented.

Keywords

Citation

Hunt, A.K., Wang, J., Alizadeh, A. and Pucelj, M. (2024), "Advancing a theoretical framework for exploring heuristics and biases within HR decision-making contexts", Personnel Review, Vol. 53 No. 7, pp. 1823-1841. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2023-0192

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles