Emerald logo
Advanced search

Reflections on the value and impact of library and information services: Part 2: impact assessment

Christine Urquhart (Department of Information Studies, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK)
Jenny Turner (Rosewell Library, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Tonbridge, UK)

Performance Measurement and Metrics

ISSN: 1467-8047

Publication date: 11 April 2016

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to critically review methods of impact assessment and economic analyses.

Design/methodology/approach

Reviews the literature on impact assessment, and examines some case studies of impact assessment in health libraries. Relates satisfaction and dissatisfaction assessment to impact assessment. Identifies recent impact assessment approaches in public and academic libraries, and explores different uses of terminology for impact and outcome. Reviews literature on economic analysis of value, including cost analyses, cost-effectiveness analysis and return on investment (ROI) studies.

Findings

Terms for library assessment (outcome, output, impact, value and benefit) vary among different sectors. Impact evaluation should examine initial assumptions of value carefully, and examine possible gaps in the line of argument linking inputs of library services to presumed impacts (positive and negative). More attention to sampling and response rates is required, to avoid problems such as the “warm glow” effect. Qualitative and quantitative evidence should be carefully integrated to tell the impact story. Economic impact can be estimated, but methodology depends on the service aims and sector.

Originality/value

Demonstrates that some of the requirements for traditional impact assessment also affect economic analyses and ROI studies.

Keywords

  • Return on investment
  • Impact assessment
  • Economic analysis
  • Sampling
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis

Citation

Urquhart, C. and Turner, J. (2016), "Reflections on the value and impact of library and information services: Part 2: impact assessment ", Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-01-2016-0001

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication Sitemap

Policies and information

  • Legal Opens in new window
  • Editorial policy Opens in new window & originality guidelines Opens in new window
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald’s Library Advisory Network?

    You can start or join in a discussion here.
    If you’d like to know more about The Network, please email us

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Frequently Asked Questions

    Your questions answered here