The curious reaction to an auditor’s adverse opinion: a case study from 1976

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to identify the circumstances that gave rise to an adverse audit opinion by a New Zealand (Christchurch) accounting firm, Hicks and Ainger, on the annual financial report of the local firm, T.J. Edmonds Ltd, in 1976. In so doing, this study revealed not only previously undocumented issues surrounding major asset purchases but also the impact of key personalities before and after the adverse opinion decision.

Design/methodology/approach

The study is located within the Cultural Theory of History, to theorize the narratives within the wider contextual perspective. The issues surrounding the use of memory from such interviews are also considered. The key material offered in this study is sourced from a 2015 interview with the two key audit partners in this audit engagement.

Findings

The accounting standard on depreciation at that time, SSAP 3, had not been applied properly to the accounting treatment of four helicopters for wild deer operations, purchased a week before balance date. Neither the artificial suppression of profits by this purchase decision and accounting choice nor the fall in profits nor the adverse opinion, influenced share prices or shareholder perceptions long term.

Originality/value

The significance of this project is that it informs the appreciation of the importance of contextual understanding of a singular adverse audit opinion.

Citation

Zeff, S.A. and Baskerville, R.F. (2018), "The curious reaction to an auditor’s adverse opinion: a case study from 1976", Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 500-516. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-01-2018-0006