To read this content please select one of the options below:

The effect of ownership-control disparity on the Chinese firm’s real activity earnings management

Sang Ho Kim (International Business School Suzhou (IBSS), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China)
Yohan An (Department of Finance and Accounting, Tongmyong University, Busan, Korea)

Pacific Accounting Review

ISSN: 0114-0582

Article publication date: 6 November 2018

Issue publication date: 22 November 2018

616

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the impact of the separation between control and cash flow rights (control-ownership disparity) on the earnings management practices of Chinese firms. The notable features of Chinese firms are those of concentrated ownership and the severe disparity that exists between the control and cash flow rights of controlling shareholders.

Design/methodology/approach

This study measures the level of Chinese firms’ earnings management by adopting two different methods of measurement: accrual-based earnings management (AEM) and real activity earnings management (REM). The authors also consider the possible trade-off effects between these two types of measurements. The data set in this study encompasses over 2,000 Chinese firms, using data from 2003 to 2015.

Findings

The results indicate that controlling shareholders are more likely to engage in AEM as their cash flow rights are more concentrated, while they are less likely to use REM as the disparity of control-cash flow rights increases. Further, this inverse relationship between REM and control-cash flow rights disparity becomes more pronounced in the case of a low cash flow rights group. As REM generally causes distortions in firms’ operations, it is possible that the controlling shareholders are more likely to constrain the use of REM as the disparity is perceived to grow. This result may indicate a reduced agency problem between controlling and minority shareholders due to the developing and/or existing ownership dispersions, which are mainly driven by recent reforms applied to Chinese capital markets. However, we do not entirely exclude the possibility of other types of expropriations by the controlling shareholders. It appears that the controlling shareholders are still able to exert a significant level of control, even following a substantial ownership dispersion, and they may seek alternative expropriation methods, including but not limited to intercorporate loan or related party transactions as the disparity of control-cash flow rights increases.

Originality/value

Although the Chinese economy is experiencing a series of reforms to infuse market forces into capital markets, little has been known about the effects of ownership-control disparity in Chinese firms. Our findings highlight the importance of the country specific context in this vein of research.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors deeply appreciate the valuable comments and suggestions of anonymous reviewers and the editor, Rahman Asheq, for improving this study. The authors are also indebted to Professor Chan-Shik Jung (Dong-A University) for his insightful comments at the KFMA 2016 conference.

Citation

Kim, S.H. and An, Y. (2018), "The effect of ownership-control disparity on the Chinese firm’s real activity earnings management", Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 482-499. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-01-2018-0003

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles