TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose– This paper aims to provide a framework for understanding and differentiating among different forms of game-based teaching and learning (GBTL). Design/methodology/approach– The framework is based on an analysis of existing literature and descriptions of GBTL in varied higher education settings, combined with case examples of the author’s personal experience as instructors of GBTL courses. Findings– Four frames or categories of GBTL approaches were identified: the action frame, the structuring frame, the bridging frame and the design frame. Each frame represents a spectrum of related yet varied strategies and assumptions. Originality/value– This framework is a first attempt at providing an analytic tool for making sense of the varied instantiations of GBTL in higher education. It can be useful as a heuristic tool for researchers as well as a generative model for designing future GBTL practices.
VL  - 24
IS  - 1
SN  - 1074-8121
DO  - 10.1108/OTH-11-2015-0069
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-11-2015-0069
AU  - Holmes Jeffrey B.
AU  - Gee Elisabeth R.
ED  - Assistant Prof. Elizabeth King, Prof. Constance Steinkuehler, Dr. Elisabeth R. Gee, Assoc. Prof. Danielle Herro, Dr. Jeffrey B. Holmes and Prof. Ellyn Dickmann
PY  - 2016
Y1  - 2016/01/01
TI  - A framework for understanding game-based teaching and learning
T2  - On the Horizon
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 1
EP  - 16
Y2  - 2024/05/05
ER  -