To read this content please select one of the options below:

How to conduct a multi-item research assessment in bibliometric studies? Theoretical support and empirical evidence

Chien Hsiang Liao (Department of Information Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan)

Online Information Review

ISSN: 1468-4527

Article publication date: 10 August 2015

371

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to enrich the understanding of how to form a multi-item assessment and what approaches can be applied for researchers.

Design/methodology/approach

This study proposes three ways to form a multi-item assessment (i.e. separate, formative and reflective approaches) and further makes a comparison between these three approaches.

Findings

The results show that multi-item assessment, particularly for formative and reflective constructs, has greater explanatory power in the research model. Finally, this study provides a roadmap to guide future researchers’ decision strategy for selecting multi-item assessments.

Originality/value

Due to the multi-faceted nature of research, using a single indicator to judge a scholar’s research performance will never reveal a multi-faceted picture and can easily result in measurement bias. In this vein, researchers should use different evaluation approaches and indicators to address various forms of research outcomes. However, prior studies rarely adopt multi-item scales to evaluate research performance and seldom discuss how to build a composite construct of research performance. This study aims to fill this research gap in the literature.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express his gratitude to the editor and anonymous reviewers of Online Information Review for their insightful comments. In addition this work was partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 103-2410-H-025-002).

Citation

Liao, C.H. (2015), "How to conduct a multi-item research assessment in bibliometric studies? Theoretical support and empirical evidence", Online Information Review, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 574-587. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2015-0041

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles