To read this content please select one of the options below:

Sorghum bean composite porridge nutritional quality and acceptability

Jose Candace Jackson (University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana)
Lorraine Weatherspoon (Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA)
Maria Nnyepi (University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana)
Leapetswe Malete (University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana)
Lucky Mokgatlhe (University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana)
Philemon Lyoka (University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana)
Maurice Bennink (Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA)

Nutrition & Food Science

ISSN: 0034-6659

Article publication date: 6 September 2013

448

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to study the quality of porridge made from cereal legume composite flour and to compare with a porridge that it is traditionally eaten.

Design/methodology/approach

The nutritional composition as well as protein, microbiological, and sensory quality of porridge from a sorghum bean composite flour was assessed and compared with sorghum porridge (SP) that is traditionally eaten in Botswana.

Findings

Results indicated that the nutrient composition and the protein quality of the sorghum bean composite porridge were significantly higher than that of the SP. The majority of children and adults rated the sensory attributes of the sorghum composite porridge highly and adult consumers indicated willingness to buy it.

Originality/value

The study demonstrates that using traditionally consumed foods, which are culturally acceptable and low cost, such as sorghum and sugar beans, can improve nutritional and sensory attributes when composited. These composited foods can then be recommended as a sustainable supplementary food source to improve the nutritional status and health of vulnerable populations such as HIV+ children.

Keywords

Citation

Candace Jackson, J., Weatherspoon, L., Nnyepi, M., Malete, L., Mokgatlhe, L., Lyoka, P. and Bennink, M. (2013), "Sorghum bean composite porridge nutritional quality and acceptability", Nutrition & Food Science, Vol. 43 No. 5, pp. 453-461. https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-03-2012-0024

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles