To read this content please select one of the options below:

“Facilitators” vs “substitutes”: the influence of artificial intelligence products’ image on consumer evaluation

Xin Wang (School of Business, Hohai University, Nanjing, China)
Hong Zhu (Department of Marketing and E-business, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China)
Di Jiang (Department of Marketing and E-business, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China)
Shaoang Xia (Department of Chinese Legal Modernization Studies, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China)
Chunqu Xiao (Department of Marketing and E-business, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China)

Nankai Business Review International

ISSN: 2040-8749

Article publication date: 12 January 2023

Issue publication date: 16 March 2023

981

Abstract

Purpose

The rapid innovation of artificial intelligence (AI) technology promotes the prosperity of the AI product market. However, consumers seem to have negative attitudes (e.g. prejudice, aversion) toward AI products and services. Those negative attitudes are rooted in the fear that AI might replace humans. The authors thus propose that turning the image of AI from substitutes to facilitators can alleviate identity threat perception. This paper aims to examine how the image of AI products (facilitators vs substitutes) influences consumer evaluation and explores the underlying mechanism and boundary conditions.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses four experiments with between-subjects designs to investigate whether the image of AI products (facilitators vs substitutes) will affect consumer evaluation in specific consumption and service scenarios. The same products (or services) were manipulated as “substitute” or “facilitator” through advertisement slogans. Participants were randomly assigned to a condition and read the advertisement, then they reported their evaluation. The mediator perceived identity threat and the moderator preconceived perceptions of AI risks were measured by scales. The moderator, self-affirmation, was manipulated through the instruction of the experiment.

Findings

This study demonstrates that consumers give higher evaluation of AI products in the image of the facilitator than in the image of the substitute (Study 1). The underlying mechanism is that the perceived identity threat caused by “facilitator” products is lower than “substitute” products (Study 2). The effect of AI image is moderated by consumers’ preconceived perceptions of AI risks (Study 3) and self-affirmation (Study 4). Specifically, for consumers who have a strong AI risk-perception, this effect exists, but it disappears for consumers who have a weak AI risk perception. When consumers are given a strong self-affirmation, the negative impact of the “substitute” image disappears.

Originality/value

This paper analyzes the psychological root of consumers’ negative evaluation of AI technology from the perspective of AI’s image. The proposed typology of “substitutes” and “facilitators” helps expand the vision on brand/product image and enriches the research on consumer self-identity in today’s highly informatized market. The findings shed light on how to choose appropriate image for AI products, which will be crucial for increasing consumers’ acceptance of AI products.

Keywords

Citation

Wang, X., Zhu, H., Jiang, D., Xia, S. and Xiao, C. (2023), "“Facilitators” vs “substitutes”: the influence of artificial intelligence products’ image on consumer evaluation", Nankai Business Review International, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-05-2022-0051

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles